← Search

Jeremy Tuite

VENTURA, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 42W–16L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jeremy Tuite to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Wood Ranch Alley Cats Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Candace Scholler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · Wood Ranch Tri Tippers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patrick Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Wood Ranch Tri Tippers · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Martin Lotz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-28 · Wood Ranch · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Harry Mapanda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · Wood Ranch · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-14 · Wood Ranch · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-06 · Wood Ranch · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Martin Lotz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · Wood Ranch · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Martin Lotz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-24 · Wood Ranch · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Martin Lotz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-09 · Wood Ranch · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-03 · Wood Ranch · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · Wood Ranch · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
92.6%
25W–2L · 66% of games
4.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 44.4% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova