← Search

Rich Johnson

— year-end
53 matches · 27W–26L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rich Johnson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-07-13 · A40 4.5M NR Horwich · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Horwich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Abbas Lamouri / Michael Levy
2026-07-11 · NEO/Hoover/A65&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Fritz Byers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · A55 8.0M TC Limberg · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hazem Nouraldin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · NEO/Hoover/A65&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rich Frey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-22 · A40 4.5M NR Horwich · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Reutepohler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Michael Levy / Brian Landsman
2026-06-20 · NEO/Hoover/A65&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Latham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-17 · A55 8.0M TC Limberg · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andreas Spintzyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · NEO/Hoover/A65&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rich Frey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · NEO/Hoover/A65&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Klein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-03 · A55 8.0M TC Limberg · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Zsigray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Daniel Tyrpak / Kent Smith
2026-05-27 · A55 8.0M TC Limberg · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hazem Nouraldin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · A55 8.0M TC Limberg · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hazem Nouraldin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams13 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 41.6% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 60.9% of games
8.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 46.2% of games
9.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams