← Search

Lisa Graveline

Park City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 23W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lisa Graveline to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
W
2026-09-09 · PC MARC-Schlachter · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Schlachter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
Megan Moore / Cameron Nelson
2026-08-10 · #3 Doubles · with Rachel Malueg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue Ann Kern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Rothkopf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-29 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcey Goldner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Karr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-06 · Park City Racquet Pack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Ann Kern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Karr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joyce Krawiecki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynette Maloney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
52.4%
11W–10L · 56.9% of games
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 35.5% of games
6.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.6% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert