← Search

Jeanette Soriano

Oreland, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 27W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeanette Soriano to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-07-18 · Frog 55+ Zieske · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Arevalo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · Frog 55+ Zieske · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Arevalo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · 40 Fort · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Witt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-06 · Kicking Aces · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Hammer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · Kicking Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Heeter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · Kicking Aces · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-6
W
2026-05-09 · Kicking Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharyl Hostrander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-03-27 · Scoopers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bret Cohen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-08 · Scoopers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bret Cohen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-06-24 · UD Smash Squad · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Sassoli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margery Hoffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kay Sickles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 55.2% of games
4.0
12%
3W–22L · 35.6% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 50% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 50.6% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe