← Search

Ed Heacox

Dublin, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 12W–4L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Ed Heacox to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
W
2026-05-23 · BAY CLUB PL 55AM8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Torr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-08 · BAY CLUB PL 55AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Torr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-04-28 · BAY CLUB PL 55AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anton Hofmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · PLEASANTON 55AM9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Ehlert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Iris Xin / Eric Nguyen
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · with Shirley Cu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-23 · PLEASANTON 55AM9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rick Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-20 · BAY CLUB PL 55AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Torr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-03-15 · BAY CLUB PL 18MX8.0B · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shirley Cu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-12 · PLEASANTON 40AM4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jose Ramirez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-10 · BAY CLUB PL 40AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerome Pons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-07 · BAY CLUB PL 40AM4.0A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerome Pons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-02-04 · BAY CLUB PL 18MX8.0B · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shirley Cu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
100%
4W–0L · 64.1% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 60.4% of games
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova