← Search

Greg Battalia

Cornelius, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 3W–16L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Greg Battalia to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
L
2026-04-16 · LTVA-Vallejos/mccue/Bailey · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-02 · LTVA-Vallejos/mccue/Bailey · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-18 · LTVA-Vallejos/Bailey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephen Varshine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-17 · LTVA-Vallejos/Bailey Rd 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-09-18 · LTVA-Vallejos/NMP-Bailey · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marcus Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-07 · MLSIG-Igharas/Edgemoor MX 40 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Anne Emlong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-06-09 · MLSIG-Igharas/Edgemoor MX 40 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Japec mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-05-06 · LJLA-Lands/NMP · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Razewski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-06 · LSHU-Hudson/ Jetton Sat 18+ 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Hogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-05-03 · LSHU-Hudson/ Jetton Sat 18+ 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Hogg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-22 · LSHU-Hudson/ Jetton Sat 18+ 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-20 · LJLA-Lands/NMP · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 31.8% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 28.4% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer