← Search

Charlene Mathis

Rome, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
73 matches · 33W–40L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Charlene Mathis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
L
2026-07-07 · Lucky · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Logan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
Jennifer Martin / Jenna Thomas
2026-06-30 · Lucky · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Lander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-23 · Lucky · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Lander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · Lucky · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Layne Scoggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-03 · Lucky · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Logan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-08 · Cargle · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Peal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-01 · Crymes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucky Chan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-28 · Cargle · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phyllis Searles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Kimberly Brown / Ashley Venkatesu
2026-03-25 · Crymes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucky Chan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-11 · Crymes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucky Chan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-03-02 · Crymes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucky Chan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-01-20 · Chan · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cindy Logan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
61.9%
26W–16L · 51.5% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
25%
5W–15L · 42.5% of games
3.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 54.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams