← Search

Martha Stoney

— year-end
71 matches · 32W–39L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Martha Stoney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-08-18 · LCTA18/Boyd/Creekside · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anna Cline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · LCTA65/Lewis/I'on · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Linda Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · LCTA65/Lewis/I'on · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Linda Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-11 · LCTA65/Dever/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marie Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
Boo Collins / Mary Davis
2026-04-10 · LCTA55/Barkley/MPR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Dever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-20 · LCTA55/Barkley/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alise McCormack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-13 · LCTA55/Barkley/MPR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Grogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-11 · LCTA70/Portman/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Dever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-18 · LCTA70/Portman/MPR · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Cheeseman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-12-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dara Rosenfeld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-12-03 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashlee Henney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
Ann Schwartz / Margaret Rudisill
2025-11-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
52.9%
18W–16L · 55.2% of games
3.5
38.7%
12W–19L · 45.9% of games
6.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe