← Search

Anita Spraggs

Simi Valley, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 73W–83L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anita Spraggs to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history156 matches
W
2026-08-22 · Triple Crowns · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Leahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-14 · V- LLW Tightly Strung- Kapur · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kasia Domenech
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Nancy Leahy championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Gizelda Parr championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Manuela Aschacher championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · V- LLW Tightly Strung- Kapur · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kasia Domenech
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · V- LLW Tightly Strung- Kapur · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kasia Domenech
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Phuong Tran / Jeff Cardoni
2026-07-26 · Ball Breakers/Lula-Siojo/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Williams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · Triple Crowns · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Leahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · Ball Breakers/Lula-Siojo/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Paulo Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · V- LLW Tightly Strung- Kapur · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kasia Domenech
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-11 · Triple Crowns · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Leahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
55.8%
29W–23L · 53.8% of games
3.5
43.6%
24W–31L · 47.5% of games
6.0
100%
4W–0L · 68.1% of games
7.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 49.8% of games
3.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 48.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
47 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer