← Search

Lee Picklesimer

— year-end
45 matches · 31W–14L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Lee Picklesimer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-08-10 · Chapman 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PM · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6
W
2026-07-14 · Chapman 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PM · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-06-15 · Chapman 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PM · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-08 · Chapman 18s 4.5M Singles Mon PM · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-05 · Davis 40s 4.5M Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eric Anthony
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-04 · Houston/Burns 18s 4.5M Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tommy Houston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-29 · Houston/Burns 18s 4.5M Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chuck Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-29 · Burns 55s 9.0M Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Eric Anthony
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-28 · Davis 40s 4.5M Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Jack Oldis / Michael Parker
2026-04-27 · Houston/Burns 18s 4.5M Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kenny Winter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-19 · Houston/Burns 18s 4.5M Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Phil Payne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-08 · Burns 55s 9.0M Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Scott Dean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
72.7%
16W–6L · 55.2% of games
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
60%
3W–2L · 56.5% of games
9.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 65.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#3 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova