← Search

Lauren Higgins

— year-end
100 matches · 62W–38L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Lauren Higgins to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
W
2026-09-01 · 4.0 SRP1 Stussie W18F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natasha Huzevka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-18 · 8.5 SRP Jackson/Scott WTuesPM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Gravel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-11 · 8.5 SRP Jackson/Scott WTuesPM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Natasha Huzevka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-04 · 8.5 SRP Jackson/Scott WTuesPM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amy Gravel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · 8.5 SRP Jackson/Scott WTuesPM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Natasha Huzevka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-07 · 8.5 SRP Jackson/Scott WTuesPM · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Natasha Huzevka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-30 · 8.5 SRP Jackson/Scott WTuesPM · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Valeria Laguna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-09 · 8.5 SRP Jackson/Scott WTuesPM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Gabrielle Dougan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-24 · 4.0 KIW Shark Mode X18S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Awais Mirza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-17 · 4.0 KIW Shark Mode X18S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hirotomo Nakazawa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-04-07 · 4.0 SRP Net Chaos W18S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Thornsburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-03 · 4.0 KIW Shark Mode X18S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Madrid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
Teams14 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
70.2%
40W–17L · 58.5% of games
4.5
50%
5W–5L · 46.1% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 45.6% of games
8.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 47.8% of games
4.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 53% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#1 Singles
18%
18 matches
#2 Singles
9%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova