← Search

Annmarie Taggio

Mount Pleasant, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
198 matches · 111W–87L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Annmarie Taggio to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history198 matches
W
2026-09-07 · LCTA40/LeCheminant/Hamlin · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Pernell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-06 · LCTA55/Wiggins/MPR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-05 · LCTA55/Wiggins/MPR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimber Wiggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-31 · LCTA40/LeCheminant/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kate Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-26 · LCTA18/Zhang/MPR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Glenn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · LCTA40/LeCheminant/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristen Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-22 · LCTA55/Wiggins/MPR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimber Wiggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-19 · LCTA18/Zhang/MPR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sarah Glenn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-17 · LCTA40/LeCheminant/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kate Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · LCTA55/Wiggins/MPR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-08-15 · LCTA40/LeCheminant/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Hendrix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-15 · LCTA55/Wiggins/MPR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimber Wiggins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 69.7% of games
4.0
49.6%
58W–59L · 49.7% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
69.7%
23W–10L · 56.6% of games
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 47.5% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 56.8% of games
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 65.6% of games
7.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 36.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
90 matches
#1 Singles
20%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
20 matches
#2 Singles
7%
14 matches
#3 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe