← Search

Tom Rude

Sammamish, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 30W–28L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Tom Rude to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-09-12 · BC-Glass · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pete Moe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
Alexandru Herman / Ramji Beera
2026-02-28 · BC-Park · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kwang Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-02-07 · BC-Park · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Griff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-18 · BC-Park · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erwin Chung
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-11-22 · BC-Scher · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Chaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-17 · BC-Scher · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Chaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-09-27 · BC-Scher · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gordon Kamisar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2025-09-06 · BC-Scher · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Moline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-06-01 · BC-Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5
L
2025-05-18 · BC-Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-10 · BC-Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Haba
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-03 · BC-Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
60%
21W–14L · 53.8% of games
8.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 50.6% of games
8.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert