← Search

Mary Jane Toolson

— year-end
68 matches · 32W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Jane Toolson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-07-10 · VTC-Dybdahl/Hendrix · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Pamela Lagielski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · VTC-Dybdahl/Hendrix · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Melodie Seelbinder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · VTC-Dybdahl/Hendrix · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Anne Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-02-19 · CV-Gellner/Willsey/Austin · #6 Doubles · with Mary Austin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-12 · CV-Gellner/Willsey/Austin · #5 Doubles · with Julie Henthorn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-05 · CV-Gellner/Willsey/Austin · #4 Doubles · with Petra Gellner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-01-29 · CV-Gellner/Willsey/Austin · #6 Doubles · with Joan Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-22 · CV-Gellner/Willsey/Austin · #5 Doubles · with Mary Austin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-01-15 · CV-Gellner/Willsey/Austin · #6 Doubles · with Mary Austin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-07-11 · VTC-Dybdahl/Hendrix · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Pamela Lagielski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
Mary Fox / Mona Knudslien
2025-03-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claire Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Felton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 55.9% of games
3.0
50%
9W–9L · 49.2% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 48% of games
7.0
20%
2W–8L · 38.5% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
10 matches
#6 Doubles
4%
3 matches
#5 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams