← Search

Sharlene Bartlett

— year-end
191 matches · 81W–110L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sharlene Bartlett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history191 matches
W
2026-01-15 · 6.0 STRC Tabar W65F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deb Touzell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-12 · 6.0 STRC Tabar W65F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Margie Vasquez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-08 · 6.0 STRC Tabar W65F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rosemary Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-12-11 · 6.0 STRC Tabar W65F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Vetter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-13 · 6.0 STRC Tabar W65F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Monica Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-06 · 6.0 STRC Tabar W65F · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debra White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-23 · 6.0 STRC Tabar W65F · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pat Cleveland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-19 · 6.0 KIW Net Stalkers W55S · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Miriam Spizzirri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-04-10 · PHX/Tabar/65&O/6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rhonda Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-04-03 · 7.0 ISP Howell W65S · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-22 · PHX/Tabar/65&O/6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rhonda Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-20 · PHX/Tabar/65&O/6.0W · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ginny Althoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
42.9%
21W–28L · 48.5% of games
3.5
22.2%
6W–21L · 37.5% of games
5.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
53.5%
46W–40L · 51.3% of games
6.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 42.9% of games
7.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 32.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
33 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams