← Search

Jane O'Brien

Shoreline, WA
2.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 7W–9L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane O'Brien to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
W
2026-04-28 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lee Darrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-06 · HBSQ-Team #1 A-Huff · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Eli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-04-15 · HBSQ-Team #1 A-Huff · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Eli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-14 · HBSQ-James Gang · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-04-17 · HBSQ-James Gang · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Snyder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-20 · HBSQ-James Gang · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2023-05-17 · HBSQ-Hong/Matysik · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hui Hong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2023-04-05 · HBSQ-Hong/Matysik · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hui Hong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2023-03-28 · HBSQ-Hong/Matysik · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hui Hong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2022-05-10 · HBSQ-Matysik/Hong · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2020-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 37.5% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 56.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert