← Search

Monica Warman

— year-end
87 matches · 46W–41L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Monica Warman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2025-10-31 · Leventhal/Potash (Royal Palm) · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maria de Las Casas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-10-28 · Royal Palm (Anderson) · #2 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Potash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-09-12 · Leventhal/Potash (Royal Palm) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Potash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-06-10 · Etzold (Royal Palm) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diana Eldridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-05-15 · #6 Female Doubles · 4.5 · with Julie Gutierrez-Fletcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-01 · #4 Female Doubles · 4.5 · with Brenda Hoppe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
N/A
2025-04-24 · #5 Female Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracey Kealy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-04-17 · Leventhal/Potash (Royal Palm) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janna Dadesky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-11 · Leventhal/Potash (Royal Palm) · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janna Dadesky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-11-08 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Salgado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2024-10-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Salgado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2024-10-12 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenda Salgado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Teams35 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
57.6%
34W–25L · 53.4% of games
4.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 52% of games
7.5
40%
4W–6L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
26 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
8 matches
#2 Female Doubles
7%
6 matches
#6 Female Doubles
6%
5 matches
#5 Female Doubles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert