← Search

Adam Huff

Centennial, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 62W–123L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Adam Huff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history185 matches
L
2026-09-02 · PCRK YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bob Lees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-01 · PCRK YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonah Staller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · PCRK YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Craig Claxton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-12 · PCRK YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonah Staller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · PCRK YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Pinkerton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-22 · PCRK YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Pinkerton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-08 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Schroer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-01 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Schroer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Pinkerton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-17 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Pinkerton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cynthia Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-10 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Schroer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
45.9%
28W–33L · 50.4% of games
4.5
22%
13W–46L · 40.1% of games
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 52.8% of games
8.0mixed
39.4%
13W–20L · 48.8% of games
8.5mixed
15.4%
2W–11L · 37.4% of games
9.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 41.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
86 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
42 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova