← Search

Randall Paulson

— year-end
120 matches · 74W–46L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Randall Paulson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-06-29 · Peschel S2026 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stewart Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · Narvaez · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Iverson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Chris Johnson / Thomas Genz
2026-06-22 · Peschel S2026 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Whitaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · Peschel S2026 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Charles Carroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · Peschel S2026 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stewart Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-10 · Peschel S2026 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Peschel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-09 · Narvaez · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lawrence Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · SAZ 65/ 9.0 M- Darrel Tomasa · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Doug Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · SAZ 65/ 8.0 M- Darrel Tomasa · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Spillers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-02-22 · SAZ 65/ 9.0 M- Darrel Tomasa · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robert Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-02-15 · SAZ 65/ 9.0 M- Darrel Tomasa · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ken McAdam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-09 · SAZ 65/ 8.0 M- Darrel Tomasa · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with MARK BENNETT
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
54.3%
19W–16L · 54% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
71.9%
41W–16L · 58.4% of games
9.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.6% of games
8.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 52.5% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
38 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer