← Search

Deborah Weis

Denver, CO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
164 matches · 99W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deborah Weis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history164 matches
W
2026-08-23 · DTP PINK · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Juan Pablo Sanchez Narvaez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Dorothy Ripka championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-09 · DTP PINK · #3 Doubles · 9.5 · with David Ballenger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Kelly Cohen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-14 · RRTC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dorothy Ripka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-28 · DTP RED · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Henkelmann mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · RRTC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Iapalucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
Debbie Trewitt / Catherine Allen
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Barb Hedges championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · JCC RED · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Peter Hanley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-31 · JCC RED · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with William Wall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-05-31 · DTP RED · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tally Lawing mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-05-19 · RRTC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amanda Iapalucci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
62.2%
56W–34L · 55.9% of games
8.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 66.7% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
50%
23W–23L · 50.1% of games
9.5mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
23 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova