← Search

Charlene Frazer

Gainesville, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 21W–15L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Charlene Frazer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
W
2026-06-27 · RCSP Faraci · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kerry Dobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-16 · RCSP Faraci · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Watkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-05-09 · DB Gerling 3.5 W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Akri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · with Cathy Boon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · DB Gerling 3.5 W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Ryals
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-29 · Alachua/Gilson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Boon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-01 · Alachua/Gilson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marlene Townsend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-15 · FK 55+ 7.0 GREENE TEAM · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marlene Townsend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-24 · RCSP Faraci 3.5 W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Celeste Bittner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-18 · Alachua/Gilson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marlene Townsend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-01-11 · RCSP Faraci 3.5 W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Watkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-22 · DB Arnold Justis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marlene Townsend
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
70%
7W–3L · 58.5% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 41.3% of games
7.0
80%
4W–1L · 58.2% of games
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 47% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova