← Search

Shannon Schuld-Gray

— year-end
76 matches · 42W–34L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Shannon Schuld-Gray to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · with Kim Kouwabunpat championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · with Kim Kouwabunpat championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · with Andrea Gillis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-10 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mindy Pfenning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-05 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/S Gray · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Tyra mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-04-26 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colleen Scanlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Kim · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrea Gillis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-11 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/S Gray · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Estanol mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-01 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/Sahara · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Roosen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-23 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/Crema · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Anne Medzegian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-21 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/Crema · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathleen Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-02-11 · CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/Sahara · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Roosen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.5
57.1%
16W–12L · 57.1% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 61.7% of games
9.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.2% of games
4.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 48.7% of games
8.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 63.1% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert