← Search

Jennifer Cirenza

Alexandria, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 25W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Cirenza to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-08-09 · Team 2 Called To Serve · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tamara Ashford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-5
L
2026-08-04 · Team 2 Called To Serve · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tamara Ashford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-10 · Team 1 Sledgehammers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tamara Ashford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-2
L
2026-05-19 · Team 5 In Mixed Company · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Napolitano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-2
W
2026-05-05 · Team 5 In Mixed Company · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bart Epstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-2
W
2026-04-21 · Team 5 In Mixed Company · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bart Epstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · Team 3 Sister Squad · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Yardley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-18 · Team 3 Sister Squad · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ronda Estridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-5
W
2026-01-11 · Team 7 Sledgehammers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Schnappauf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
Andrea Gevas / Jonathan Kim
2025-12-07 · Team 3 Ashford - Stars & Stripes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Napolitano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-16 · Team 3 Ashford - Stars & Stripes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marc Short mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-01 · Team 2 Sledgehammers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Marisa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
57.7%
15W–11L · 51.3% of games
4.5
0%
0W–6L · 29.9% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 39% of games
0.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51.6% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert