← Search

Cecil Ross

San Angelo, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 49W–73L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Cecil Ross to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
L
2026-08-18 · Nagel · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brent Wilcox Sr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-13 · Nagel · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beau Theimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Jacob Maenius / Damon Scott Cotton
2026-08-04 · Nagel · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brent Wilcox Sr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-20 · Ross · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Dean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Drew Springer / Rikki Sarabia Bosmans
2026-06-29 · Ross · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Dean mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-24 · Ross · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Ashley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · Ross · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christy Ross mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
Dave Schaller / Bruce Swartz
2026-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Damon Scott Cotton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tommy LaFon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
Beaumont Wilcox / Jeff Stewart
2026-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jake Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
Craig Gutierrez / Nicolas Diaz
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jake Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Kent Nally / Jacob Halsell
2026-04-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tommy LaFon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
56.1%
32W–25L · 51.2% of games
4.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 36.3% of games
7.5
17.4%
4W–19L · 39.5% of games
7.0mixed
39.1%
9W–14L · 46.3% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 36.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 57% of the time
#3 Doubles
57%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
10 matches
#1 Singles
7%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova