← Search

Cayla Jackson

Schenectady, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 34W–13L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Cayla Jackson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
W
2026-03-27 · CCC YEAGER · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-03-14 · CCC YEAGER · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-13 · CCC YEAGER · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lily Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-20 · CCC YEAGER · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-10-10 · TCU HUBER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allyson Garrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2025-10-09 · TCU BADEN · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Scott Keenan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-10-03 · TCU HUBER · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-09-18 · TCU BADEN · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Travis Satterfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-09-12 · TCU HUBER · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allyson Garrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-09-08 · TCU HUBER · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-05-31 · TCU BAYNE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Zeiser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
Joi MacY / Lori Bennett
2025-05-25 · Tebeaux · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Blair Small
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 70.9% of games
3.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 77.3% of games
4.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 66.4% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 38.4% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 43% of the time
#1 Singles
43%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
4 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova