← Search

James Hollander

LEXINGTON, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 31W–17L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add James Hollander to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history48 matches
W
2026-09-01 · KY/Lex/Matthews · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Derrick Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-23 · KY/Lex/Matthews · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Derrick Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-13 · KY/Lex/Matthews · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Derrick Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · KY/Lex/Matthews · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Derrick Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · KY/Lex/Matthews, Charles · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Profitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-05 · KY/LEX/Khan · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Santiago Bravo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-04 · KY/LEX/EDEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle MacY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-16 · KY/Lex/Matthews, Charles · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Atkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-09 · KY/LEX/EDEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keith Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · KY/Lex/Matthews, Charles · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Hawk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-25 · KY/LEX/EDEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eugene Toth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-03-21 · KY/LEX/EDEN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott True
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
79.3%
23W–6L · 62% of games
4.5
50%
4W–4L · 47.2% of games
7.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 51.8% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
10 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams