← Search

Clair Telford

Santa Barbara, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 20W–30L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Clair Telford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2026-07-02 · COAC-Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Slayman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-27 · Polo-Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Neil Friedman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-21 · COAC-Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-20 · Polo-Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Neil Friedman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · COAC-Volley Llamas · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Penke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-13 · Polo-Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Lubbers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · COAC-Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Curtin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-17 · COAC-Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Curtin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-10 · COAC-Volley Llamas · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-03 · COAC-Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Fabbre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-26 · COAC-Volley Llamas · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-19 · COAC-Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
52%
13W–12L · 50.3% of games
4.0
13.3%
2W–13L · 32.1% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova