← Search

Matt Hurley

— year-end
14 matches · 4W–10L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Matt Hurley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
2026-06-27 · Mission Oaks Geezers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Bush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-21 · Mission Oaks Geezers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andre Bati
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-06 · Mission Oaks Geezers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andre Bati
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-30 · Mission Oaks Geezers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Bush
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · Mission Oaks Foes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Colon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · Mission Oaks Foes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erik Loose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-21 · Mission Oaks Warriors · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erik Loose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-14 · Mission Oaks Warriors · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erik Loose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-01-25 · Mission Oaks Warriors · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erik Loose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-17 · Mission Oaks Warriors · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erik Loose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-01 · Mission Oaks Warriors · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Corley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-18 · Mission Oaks Warriors · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Corley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 34.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 79% of the time
#1 Doubles
79%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer