← Search

Angela Mc Clenton

Bensalem, PA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
71 matches · 20W–51L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Angela Mc Clenton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
W
2024-08-10 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendy Witt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne GRANT
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne GRANT
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Phyllis Geisdorf / Deirdre Donaghy
2024-07-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anne GRANT
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2024-05-18 · Bucks Lady Jammers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rong Nie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2024-05-11 · Bucks Lady Jammers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Salnaitis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-04-13 · Bucks Lady Jammers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Loren Herbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2023-06-24 · Lady Jammers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Rickert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2023-06-10 · Lady Jammers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Rickert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2023-06-03 · Lady Jammers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Mascio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2023-05-20 · Lady Jammers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with June Jiang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2023-05-13 · Lady Jammers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Rickert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2022–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
14.3%
5W–30L · 37.7% of games
7.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 60.4% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
17.6%
3W–14L · 37.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova