← Search

Cecilia Jones

ROCKVILLE, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
275 matches · 111W–164L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Cecilia Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history275 matches
W
2026-08-16 · Anderson & Anderson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sohee Chu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-5
L
2026-07-26 · Anderson & Anderson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruzica Ragontse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-1
W
2026-07-24 · Team 3 Graces Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenni Bae
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · Team 3 Graces Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cameron Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · Anderson & Anderson · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jerien Okoh-Tisch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-19 · Rubino · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-4
W
2026-06-16 · Team 3 Graces Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cameron Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · Team 1 Over Served · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-1
W
2026-06-12 · Rubino · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kasey Kinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-08 · Team 1 Over Served · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-4
L
2026-06-06 · Future Titans · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeri Lyn Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams90 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
60.4%
64W–42L · 55.2% of games
4.5
19.2%
5W–21L · 34.9% of games
7.5
45.2%
14W–17L · 48% of games
8.5
9.7%
3W–28L · 34.3% of games
0.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
30.6%
15W–34L · 43.6% of games
8.5mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
95 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
36 matches
#1 Singles
11%
30 matches
#2 Singles
6%
16 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King