← Search

Lois Riley

— year-end
61 matches · 25W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lois Riley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
L
2026-06-25 · MCAC:DoubleTrouble:Rawlins:Riley · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · MCAC:Sia:Beckhardt · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Oram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-6
L
2026-06-11 · MCAC:DoubleTrouble:Rawlins:Riley · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Rawlins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-5
L
2026-05-07 · MCAC:DoubleTrouble:Rawlins:Riley · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maria Difede
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-2
L
2025-11-20 · MCAC:Sia · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa-Holly Flaherty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-06 · MCAC:Sia · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-30 · MCAC:Sia · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-07-17 · MCAC:DoubleTrouble:Rawlins · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Blood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-3, 0-1
L
2025-06-11 · MCAC:Hall · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Blood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-05 · MCAC:DoubleTrouble:Rawlins · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Dexter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-05-15 · MCAC:DoubleTrouble:Rawlins · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy Dexter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-3
W
2025-05-07 · MCAC:Hall · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Rawlins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
28.6%
6W–15L · 44% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 52% of games
6.0
45.5%
15W–18L · 48% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova