← Search

Lainie Goldstein

— year-end
61 matches · 32W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lainie Goldstein to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
W
N/A
2026-07-22 · Bergen:Iron Swing · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karina Sanzari
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-15 · Bergen:Iron Swing · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-14 · Double Trouble · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susannah Brill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-10-10 · Bergen Ballerz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2024-05-28 · Leonard Wagner Arsenic & Lace · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2024-05-14 · Leonard Wagner Arsenic & Lace · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonia Arana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-05-23 · Ossining Nelson Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wendy Boiardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2023-05-09 · Ossining Nelson Park · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonia Arana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2022-06-28 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Emma Higgins
2022-06-14 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2022-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maddy Savoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2022-05-24 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
52.9%
27W–24L · 48.9% of games
4.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 53% of the time
#1 Singles
53%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#2 Singles
12%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert