← Search

Laura O'Kelley

— year-end
45 matches · 15W–30L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Laura O'Kelley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Blanton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Blanton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Blanton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-01-08 · Woodmont (Jeanine Blumer)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Vaaler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-04 · Woodmont (Jeanine Blumer)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-11-20 · Woodmont (Jeanine Blumer)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Vaaler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 3-6
L
2025-11-18 · Governors Preserve (Adrienne Nielsen)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-13 · Woodmont (Jeanine Blumer)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Vaaler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-11-06 · Woodmont (Jeanine Blumer)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Vaaler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-06-26 · Woodmont (Jeanine Blumer)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Vaaler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-6
W
2025-06-12 · Woodmont (Jeanine Blumer)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Vaaler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 7-5
L
2025-06-06 · Woodmont (Jeanine Blumer)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams6 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
33.3%
15W–30L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams