← Search

Andrew Snell

Redding, CT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 106W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Andrew Snell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
L
2026-07-09 · Chestnut Ridge 18+ 4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick O'Mara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-18 · Chestnut Ridge 18+ 4.0M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Shapiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-21 · Chestnut Ridge 18+ 4.0M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · SOL:Love Hurts:Welch/Snell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tara Robinson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
Deidra Picciano / James Monroe
2026-04-18 · SOL:Love Hurts:Welch/Snell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Chen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-12 · SOL:Love Hurts:Welch/Snell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amanda Northrop mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-04 · SOL:Love Hurts:Welch/Snell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Chen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-27 · SOL:Love Hurts: Welch · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cara Herdeg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · SOL:Love Hurts: Welch · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tory Woodruff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-28 · MRC:Mayhem:Boucher · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erik Serby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 5-7
W
2026-01-31 · SOL:Love Hurts:Welch/Snell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tara Robinson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-01-24 · SOL:Love Hurts: Welch · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tory Woodruff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
71.9%
41W–16L · 57.3% of games
7.0mixed
70.4%
38W–16L · 57.3% of games
8.0mixed
56.5%
13W–10L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
34 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova