← Search

Dan Derosalia

Selden, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 49W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dan Derosalia to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Ian Zaslansky championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-15 · EAC, Subject/Dulberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Zaslansky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-01 · Morley, Moramarco · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Zaslansky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · EAC, Subject/Dulberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Zaslansky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-06-17 · Morley, Moramarco · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kuo Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · EAC, Subject/Dulberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Connor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-01 · EAC, Subject/Dulberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Zaslansky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-26 · Morley, Moramarco · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Zaslansky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-19 · EAC, Subject/Dulberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donald Henn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · Morley, Moramarco · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Zaslansky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-01 · LIHR, Adams/Freeman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Merri Laffitte mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · LIHR, Adams/Freeman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Petra Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
66.7%
40W–20L · 57.3% of games
4.5
0%
0W–5L · 30.2% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 56% of the time
#2 Doubles
56%
47 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer