← Search

Brenda van Den Enden

Peachtree City, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 41W–39L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Brenda van Den Enden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-09-09 · PTC Feygin/Stoots · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Stoots
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-02 · PTC Feygin/Stoots · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lan Skerchock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · PTCTC-Stoots/Simpson · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Hicks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-29 · PTCTC-Castellow/Stoots · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Feygin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-22 · PTCTC-Castellow/Stoots · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Feygin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-15 · PTCTC-Castellow/Stoots · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peggy Bernth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-02 · PTCTC-Stoots/Simpson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laureena McCormack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-01 · PTCTC-Castellow/Stoots · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanne Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-29 · PTCTC-Castellow/Stoots · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanne Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-24 · PTCTC-Castellow/Stoots · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Power
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-06-03 · PTCTC-Castellow/Stoots · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanne Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-29 · PTCTC - Castellow/Stoots · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Applegate
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
58.6%
41W–29L · 52.3% of games
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 28.5% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer