← Search

Thomas Hirsch

— year-end
45 matches · 24W–21L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Thomas Hirsch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-05-12 · Naples Grande / Carran · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kevin O'Brien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-05 · Cambier / Packo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Kardek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6
L
2026-04-30 · Cambier / Packo · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chadwick Commers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-28 · Naples Grande / Carran · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Brewer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
Chris King / Corey Kotlarz
2026-04-14 · Cambier / Packo · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Kardek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-07 · Naples Grande / Carran · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kevin O'Brien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-03-04 · Naples Grande / Carran · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Mcilwain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-02-25 · Naples Grande / Carran · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Chafee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-19 · Cambier / Packo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Massey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-18 · Naples Grande / Carran · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Mcilwain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-04 · Naples Grande / Carran · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Mcilwain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-28 · Naples Grande / Carran · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
57.1%
12W–9L · 52.6% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams