← Search

Jane Emge

Mt Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 16W–31L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jane Emge to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history47 matches
W
2026-04-15 · LCTA40/Lauer/DunesWest · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Baraso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-08 · LCTA40/Lauer/DunesWest · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Breidenbruch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-02-25 · LCTA40/Lauer/DunesWest · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marissa Regan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-16 · LCTA40/Lauer/DunesWest · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Ruppel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-11 · LCTA40/Lauer/DunesWest · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Passman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-12-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-11-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Passman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2025-10-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Ruppel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Baraso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslie Baraso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Breidenbruch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
34%
16W–31L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
7 matches
#1 Singles
9%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal