← Search

Tim Hasara

— year-end
51 matches · 27W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tim Hasara to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
L
2025-10-12 · Ackermann/Rigby (F) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brad Tinnon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-05 · Ackermann/Rigby (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Snider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-09-27 · STL/Shouldis/55&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Carey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-05-06 · STL/Shouldis/55&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Snider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-04-22 · STL/Shouldis/55&Over8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Snider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-04-13 · Elias/Shultz (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Tesar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-03-23 · Elias/Shultz (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-03-02 · Elias/Shultz (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregg Hammann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-02-23 · Elias/Shultz (S) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-6
L
2025-02-09 · Elias/Shultz (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Tesar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-5
L
2024-12-08 · Elias/Shultz (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brice Shultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-5, 0-1
W
2024-11-24 · Elias/Shultz (F) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brice Shultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 53% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 40.8% of games
8.0
100%
7W–0L · 74.6% of games
9.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 35.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#1 Singles
14%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams