← Search

Jane Hodges

Henderson, NV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
110 matches · 57W–53L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Hodges to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
L
2026-05-19 · ANNETTE'S TEAM · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Annette Whiteside
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-30 · SUN CITY ANTHEM #1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Winreb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-23 · SUN CITY ANTHEM #1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Winreb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-04-09 · SUN CITY ANTHEM #1 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Clairen Peeters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-12 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annette Whiteside
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-29 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Juliann Schnabel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-19 · SUN CITY ANTHEM #1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Barrie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-05-15 · SUN CITY ANTHEM #1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Barrie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-03-20 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindi Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-03-13 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Clairen Peeters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-06 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Rowles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-30 · DRAGONRIDGE CC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annette Whiteside
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
59.4%
38W–26L · 54.2% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 39.2% of games
6.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.4% of games
7.0
39.3%
11W–17L · 48.4% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
5 matches
#2 Female Doubles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams