← Search

James McLeod

AVONDALE ESTATES, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 23W–8L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add James McLeod to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Mastrogiacomo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
Adam Christopher / Lee Hills
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Riggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-6
W
Nikhil Narwani / Mani Vermaas
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Riggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kyle Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
Joseph Gutierrez
2026-05-31 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-20 · DeKalb TC (Tyler Fabbri)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Riggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-17 · DeKalb TC (Tyler Fabbri)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Mastrogiacomo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-12-13 · DeKalb TC (Tyler Fabbri)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Riggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-12-06 · DeKalb TC (Tyler Fabbri)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Riggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 6-2
L
2025-11-22 · DeKalb TC (Tyler Fabbri)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brett Donaldson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2025-11-15 · DeKalb TC (Tyler Fabbri)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Riggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 7-6
L
2025-07-13 · Dekalb TC (Tyler Fabbri)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Morgan Wand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 62.5% of games
4.0
60%
9W–6L · 50.7% of games
3.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 62.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 68% of the time
#1 Doubles
68%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer