← Search

Carolyn Baker

LONGMONT, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 42W–26L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carolyn Baker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-08-20 · BTA-C GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-13 · BTA-C GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-23 · BTA-C GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Germano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Stephanie Sims / Katie Kennedy
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Jennifer Germano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Katie Kennedy / Tamara Bianchi
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Germano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Germano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Germano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Germano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-21 · BTA-F GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nina Rodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-14 · BTA-F GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nina Rodd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-07 · BTA-F GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Germano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-30 · BTA-F GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Germano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
62.3%
33W–20L · 56.6% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#1 Singles
19%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams