← Search

Eric Hindle

Phoenix, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 32W–81L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Eric Hindle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
L
2026-09-10 · 3.5 PAS4 Douglas M18F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Krupanszky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-27 · 3.5 PAS4 Douglas M18F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Higuera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-05 · 3.5 PAS Douglas M18S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawn Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-26 · 3.5 PAS Douglas M18S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikola Radosavljevic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-19 · 3.5 PAS Douglas M18S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jayaprakash Padiyar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-29 · 3.5 PAS Douglas M18S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Harlan Levy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-20 · 3.5 PAS Douglas M18S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Smoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-15 · 3.5 PAS Douglas M18S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chad Higuera
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-20 · 3.5 PAS Douglas M18F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Krupanszky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-13 · 3.5 PAS Douglas M18F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Krupanszky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-11 · 3.5 PAS Douglas M18F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Smoll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-04 · 3.5 PAS Douglas M18F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawn Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
27.6%
24W–63L · 42.6% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.9% of games
7.0mixed
22.2%
4W–14L · 37.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
31 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer