← Search

Lee Brodeur

TODD, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
96 matches · 63W–33L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Lee Brodeur to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Mallard/Browne 40s 8.5M Combo Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Neal Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-17 · Sprague/DV/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Sprague
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Ginn/DVRC/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol Almond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-20 · Sprague/DV/Foothills · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ron Marden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Ginn/DVRC/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol Almond mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-07-13 · Sprague/DV/Foothills · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gennard Lombardozzi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-01 · Ginn/DVRC/Foothills · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kendra Gould mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
Bryan Skelton / Jacob Huffaker
2026-06-21 · #4 Doubles · with Jason Osborne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with David Sprague championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Jason Osborne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with David Sprague championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · with Jason Osborne championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 61.8% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
72.7%
32W–12L · 58.3% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.6% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal