← Search

Belinda Sime

Coral Gables, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 38W–52L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Belinda Sime to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-05-08 · Sweet Aces at Ron Ehmann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paola Jaime
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Carolina Fernandez / Gabriela Rexach
2026-05-05 · #4 Female Doubles · with Sylvia Volkova championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-28 · #3 Female Doubles · with Carolyn Seckinger championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-21 · #1 Female Doubles · with Carolyn Seckinger championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · Sweet Aces at Ron Ehmann · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-09 · Sweet Aces at Ron Ehmann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Seckinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-31 · Dante Fascell (Wilner) · #4 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Seckinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-06 · Sweet Aces at Ron Ehmann · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carolyn Seckinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-03 · Dante Fascell (Wilner) · #3 Female Doubles · 4.0 · with Emma Zapata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-27 · Sweet Aces at Ron Ehmann · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-02-20 · Sweet Aces at Ron Ehmann · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-06 · Sweet Aces at Ron Ehmann · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deanna Rasco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
37.9%
25W–41L · 45% of games
4.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 48% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 68.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 26% of the time
#1 Singles
26%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
19 matches
#3 Female Doubles
12%
11 matches
#1 Female Doubles
11%
10 matches
#2 Female Doubles
10%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer