← Search

Jackie Kaiser

Indianapolis, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
164 matches · 51W–113L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jackie Kaiser to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history164 matches
L
2026-07-28 · Indy A65 7.0W IRCD Banister · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Lockhart
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-16 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Cook · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kay Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
Marianne Vorhees / Betsy Peckinpaugh
2026-07-14 · Indy A65 7.0W IRCD Banister · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Taylor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-2
L
2026-06-26 · Indy A65 8.0W Bates · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leyna Mulholland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-8
L
2026-06-26 · Indy A65 8.0W Bates · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leyna Mulholland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-8
L
2026-06-25 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Cook · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-23 · Indy A65 7.0W IRCD Banister · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lorinne Banister
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Indy A65 7.0W IRCD Banister · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Cook
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-04 · Indy A55 7.0W E IRCD Cook · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Lockhart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-16 · Indy A55 7.0W IRCD Cook · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dawn Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-02 · Indy A55 7.0W IRCD Cook · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-25 · Indy A55 7.0W IRCD Cook · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 45.5% of games
4.0
24%
6W–19L · 41.5% of games
7.0
45.7%
21W–25L · 49.1% of games
7.5
28.1%
9W–23L · 40.6% of games
8.0
14.3%
3W–18L · 33.1% of games
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 41.4% of games
7.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 46.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer