← Teams

GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Wilcox)(TW#1)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

12 players · average NTRP 2.88 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings11 teams · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Alvarado/Adult 40 & over/3.0W9132820220
2GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Da Costa)(EPTC#2)82221838323
3GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Castaneda)(EPCC#2)73271332296
4GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Alarcon)(TW#2)73231742323
5GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Delgado)(EPTC#4)64211942352
6GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Arreola)(EPTC#1)64202044320
7GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Jabor)(EPCC#1)45201638317
8GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Cardenas)(CCC)37132759398
9GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Dennis)27162045313
10GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Boss)(NMSU)19112962407
11GEPTA-3.0-Adult/40+W(Wilcox)(TW#1)19112964437

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Alida Villarreal
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.77
Brettney Dee Wilcox
usually #2 Doubles 52%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published 3
2.57
Anu Antony
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.50
Hadley Huchton
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
—
Karla Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 61%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published —
—
Katja Luther
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published —
—
Lilly Gutierrez Molina
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 20% · published —
—
Rose Rivera
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —
—
Roxanna Medina
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published —
—
Sandra David
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published —
—
Sylvia Vega
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published —
—
Yvonne Houghton
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rose Rivera + Roxanna Medina4–1036% gamesnot enough data
Sylvia Vega + Lilly Gutierrez Molina6–555% gamesnot enough data
Brettney Dee Wilcox + Karla Griffin6–550% gamesnot enough data
Lilly Gutierrez Molina + Karla Griffin9–265% gamesnot enough data
Sylvia Vega + Sandra David4–149% gamesnot enough data
Sandra David + Hadley Huchton2–344% gamesnot enough data
Brettney Dee Wilcox + Alida Villarreal4–158% gamesnot enough data
Lilly Gutierrez Molina + Anu Antony1–34 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alida Villarreal
40W–28L career · 16 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Brettney Dee Wilcox
48W–44L career · 31 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Anu Antony
8W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.57
2.5
Hadley Huchton
10W–19L career · 12 lines in 2025
0%52%48%
2.50
—
Karla Griffin
53W–28L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Katja Luther
0W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Lilly Gutierrez Molina
38W–31L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Rose Rivera
25W–43L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Roxanna Medina
13W–34L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Sandra David
26W–36L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Sylvia Vega
27W–40L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
—
—
Yvonne Houghton
5W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.