← Teams

GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Delgado)(EPTC#1)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings8 teams · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(McCarthy)(EPTC#2)83221123226
2GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Wilcox)(TW)74211225193
3GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Jabor)(EPCC#1)65161734256
4GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Lechuga)(FB)65171637275
5GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Delgado)(EPTC#1)56171636303
6GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Fernandez)(EPTC#3)56151842309
7GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Porras)(CCC)47132045311
8GEPTA-2.5-Adult/W(Castaneda)(EPCC#2)38112247337

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Ida Santillan
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published 3
2.81
Brenda Campos Chacon
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
—
Dimna Arias
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
Iliana Lozano
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.28
Hossana Gallegos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
—
Ericka Alvarez
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
—
Luisa Franco
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published —
—
Michelle Bordier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published —
—
Myrna Dominguez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published —
—
Rosario Samaniego
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published —
—
Valeria Ocana
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published —
—
Zaira Delgado
usually #1 Doubles 26%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Bordier + Luisa Franco15–560% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Bordier + Rosario Samaniego3–14 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Campos Chacon + Michelle Bordier3–03 matchesnot enough data
Rosario Samaniego + Valeria Ocana2–13 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ida Santillan
25W–13L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%55%44%
2.98
3
Brenda Campos Chacon
25W–15L career · 14 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Dimna Arias
9W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
—
3
Iliana Lozano
7W–7L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
—
2.5
Hossana Gallegos
18W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.28
2.5
Ericka Alvarez
1W–6L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
—
—
Luisa Franco
27W–12L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
—
—
Michelle Bordier
29W–10L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
—
—
Myrna Dominguez
6W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
—
—
Rosario Samaniego
15W–15L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
—
—
Valeria Ocana
6W–6L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
—
—
Zaira Delgado
55W–34L career · 21 lines in 2024
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.