← Teams

Quail Creek - K. Tumulty

2023 Collier Adult 40 & Over Fall · Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesHeather Christie / Eileen Valerio vs MacKenzie Rickman / Karyn Sardar2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Hole / Karen Tumulty vs Peggy Hogan / Nancy Harbert4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Mallette / Julianne Lassus vs Tracy Wing / Gladyvette Benarroch4-6, 4-6
2022-12-06vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkSplit 1–1
W#2 DoublesKaren Hole / Karen Tumulty vs Kimberly Davey / Catherine Rigamer6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHeather Christie / Juliane Callis vs Rachael Klaas / Lisa Gosney6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2022-11-29vs Naples Reserve - HugginsSplit 1–1
W#2 DoublesBenita Brown / Jennifer Brown vs Amber Hill / Patrice Clapacs3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKaren Tumulty / Juliane Callis vs Gina Garfunkel / Susan Julich4-6, 4-6
2022-11-15vs World Tennis Club - LaveryLost 0–3
L#1 DoublesHeather Christie / Eileen Valerio vs Lorrie Lavery / Kimberly DiStefano6-0, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Tumulty / Kelly Stein vs Debra Logue / Teresa Benjamin3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBenita Brown / Julianne Lassus vs Jill Frank / Lori Murphy6-7, 4-6
2022-11-01vs Marco YMCA - HeiseLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJennifer Brown / Julianne Lassus vs Bernadette DiPino / Marzenna Nowak0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Hole / Karen Tumulty vs Stacy Faremouth / Tonja Brewer3-6, 0-6
2022-10-25vs Pelican Marsh - BargerLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesKaren Hole / Heather Christie vs Stephanie Foley / Nancy Krueger1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Tumulty / Noelle Penfield vs Lauren Keillor / Diana Pleeter2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-10-19vs Olde Cypress - NavarroLost 0–2
L#2 DoublesKaren Hole / Heather Christie vs Lori Coates / Minde Shinnick2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Tumulty / Noelle Penfield vs Angela Springer / Cheryl Toth2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Eileen Valerio
published 4
3.80
Amanda Mallette
published 4
3.77
Heather Christie
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Karen Hole
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Kelly Stein
published —
3.58
Mariya Rebreeva
published —
3.29
Benita Brown
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Julianne Lassus
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published —
3.19
Karen Tumulty
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
—
Jennifer Sherman
published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Mallette + Eileen Valerio7–066% games+7.3% vs expected
Karen Hole + Karen Tumulty5–1042% games+3.5% vs expected
Benita Brown + Karen Tumulty8–1043% games−2.6% vs expected
Eileen Valerio + Kelly Stein5–250% games−6.3% vs expected
Jennifer Sherman + Karen Hole5–743% games−18.6% vs expected
Julianne Lassus + Benita Brown2–350% gamesnot enough data
Julianne Lassus + Karen Tumulty1–34 matchesnot enough data
Heather Christie + Karen Hole0–33 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Eileen Valerio
16W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Amanda Mallette
12W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Heather Christie
67W–72L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Karen Hole
99W–147L career · 5 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.62
—
Kelly Stein
9W–2L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
—
Mariya Rebreeva
4W–17L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Benita Brown
25W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
—
Julianne Lassus
85W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Karen Tumulty
56W–84L career · 7 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
—
Jennifer Sherman
18W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.