← Search

Bob Maxfield

Cottonwood Heights, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
90 matches · 49W–41L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bob Maxfield to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history90 matches
W
2026-08-19 · Liberty Park-Nilson · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rob Acevedo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-11 · Utah/Sato/55&O/7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joel Littleford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-15 · Utah/Sato/55&O/7.0M · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joel Littleford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · Utah/Sato/55&O/7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thad Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2025-09-10 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Curtis Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-09-04 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Curtis Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-27 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Curtis Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craig Hendrix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
David Ludlow / Curt Howes
2025-07-12 · #1 Doubles · with Brian Lebrecht championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craig Hendrix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Lebrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Lebrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
50.9%
28W–27L · 49.3% of games
7.0
75%
6W–2L · 53.9% of games
8.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
21 matches
#1 Singles
19%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
15 matches
#2 Singles
10%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal